Bombay High Court
CP/49/2006 of MUJTABA MAHMOOD MAHMOOD KHAN and ORS Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AURANGABAD and ORS on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2006 IN WP/2764/2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1896 OF 2008 IN CP/49/2006 MUJTABA MAHMOOD MAHMOOD KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
(1)
903 CP-49.2006.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2006
IN WP/2764/2004
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1896 OF 2008
IN CP/49/2006
MUJTABA MAHMOOD MAHMOOD KHAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 14 October, 2026
Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None for the petitioners.
2. As the learned Advocate for the petitioners is elevated and thereafter retired as a Judge of this Court, notices were issued to the petitioners, but till date no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
3. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the order under contempt is complied with. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of alongwith pending civil application. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde