Bombay High Court
CP/45/2010 of KAMLAKAR GANPAT KOTE Vs THE STATE OF MAH and ORS. on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 45 OF 2010 IN WP/3174/2005 KAMLAKAR GANPAT KOTE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for
(1)
904 CP-45.2010.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 45 OF 2010
IN WP/3174/2005
KAMLAKAR GANPAT KOTE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
Mr. Shubham Kote, Advocate holding for Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent No. 6.
Mr. H.A. Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No. 7.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 14 October, 2026
Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate for respondent No.6-Municipal Corporation submits that the order under contempt is complied with by demolishing the Shopping Complex, as directed by this Court in the Writ Petition. Learned advocate for respondent No.7 also confirms the said fact.
2. In view of the statements made by learned advocates for the respondent Nos.6 and 7, nothing survives in this petition and it is therefore disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde