Bombay High Court
CA/11356/2026 of JAFAR KHAN AKBAR KHAN DIED THROUGH LRS 1A SAHIDA KHATUN JAFARKHAN AND OTHERS Vs GULAN MOHD. ALIAS CHOTU GULAM MUSTAFA DIED THROUGH LRS SAIDA BEGUM GULAM AND OTHERS on 14 October 2026
OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11355 OF 2026 IN SA/417/1999 Jafar Khan Akbar Khan Died Through Lrs Sahida Khatun Jafarkhan And Others VERSUS Gulam Mohd Alias Chhotu Gulam Mustafa And Others ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Paranjape Prakash S Advocate
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11355 OF 2026
IN SA/417/1999
Jafar Khan Akbar Khan Died Through Lrs Sahida Khatun Jafarkhan And Others
VERSUS
Gulam Mohd Alias Chhotu Gulam Mustafa And Others
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Paranjape Prakash S
Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3 in SA : Mr. S. S. Kazi
...
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11356 OF 2026
IN SA/417/1999
...
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
Dated
: October 14, 2026
PER COURT :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11355 OF 2026 :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is an application for restoration of the Second Appeal No.417 of 1999, which was dismissed by order dated 01/09/2026.
2. Perused the application. Heard the learned Advocates for both sides.
3. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed of. Page
1 of
2026:BHC-AUG:48928
987 CA 11355-2026
4. The appellant is directed to argue the appeal on the next date of hearing, as the matter has been pending for more than 27 years. If the appeal is not argued on the next date, heavy costs shall be imposed on the appellant. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11356 OF 2026 :
5. This is an application for condonation of delay of 234 days in bringing the legal representatives of respondent No.1 on record.
6. Perused the application. Heard the learned Advocate.
7. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. The delay does not appear to be deliberate. Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed of.
8. The learned Advocate, Mr. Kazi, submits that he will file his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.1. The necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. ( SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
2 of