Bombay High Court

APPLN/4158/2019 of MANMATAPPA S/O. PANDABAPPA LOKHANDE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4158 OF 2019 Manmatappa S/o. Pandabappa Lokhande And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ... Mr. T. G. Gaikwad, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent No. 1/State Mr. V. G. Kodale,

939-APPLN-4158-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

939 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4158 OF 2019

Manmatappa S/o. Pandabappa Lokhande And Others

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr

...

Mr. T. G. Gaikwad, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent No. 1/State Mr. V. G. Kodale, Advocate for Respondent No. 2

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4150 OF 2026

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4153 OF 2026

IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3006/2019

Madhavrao Hanumantrao Patil (Taklikar) and Others

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr

...

Mr. V. G. Kodale, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent No. 1/State Mr. T. G. Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondents CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J

DATE

:OCTOBER 13, 2026

P. C. :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Criminal Application Nos. 4150/2026 and 4153/2026 are not on board.

2. Upon mentioning and by consent of both sides, are taken on board.

3. Criminal Application No. 4150/2026 is for restoration of Criminal Application No. 3006/2019 and Criminal Application No. 4153/2026 is filed for amendment to the Application No. 3006/2019 with regard to fact of filing of charge-sheet.

4. Heard learned Counsels for both sides in Criminal Application

939-APPLN-4158-2019.odt Nos. 4150/2026 and 4153/2026.

5. Learned Counsel for Applicants submits that only for the reason that warrant came to be issued against Applicants, Application No. 3006/2019 was withdrawn as recorded in order dated 24.09.2025. It is his submission that this withdrawal was not on merit. He further submits that now parties have settled the dispute amicably and as such, restoration of Application No. 3006/2019 is necessary.

6. Learned APP opposed application.

7. Learned Counsel for Informant records no objection for restoration of Application No. 3006/2019. He concedes to the statement made with regard to the settlement arrived at between the parties.

8. Having regard to these facts, both Applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A’. Criminal Application No. 3006/2019 stands restored to its original position. Amendment be carried out before next date of hearing.

9. By consent of both sides, list these Applications on 28.10.2026 under the caption of ‘settlement’. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead