Bombay High Court

CA/12020/2026 of SYED JAHEDABEGAM CHANDPASHA MULLA Vs ABDUL QUADAR FATE MOHAMMAD INAMDAR AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

12020 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12020 OF 2026 IN SA/638/2019 Syed Jahedabegam Chandpasha Mulla VERSUS Abdul Quadar Fate Mohammad Inamdar And Others ... Mr. Deshpande Gaurav L, Advocate for Applicant WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.

973 CA NO. 12020 OF 2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12020 OF 2026

IN SA/638/2019

Syed Jahedabegam Chandpasha Mulla

VERSUS

Abdul Quadar Fate Mohammad Inamdar And Others

...

Mr. Deshpande Gaurav L, Advocate for Applicant WITH

SECOND APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2019

….

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 13.10.2026

P.C. :-

SECOND APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant.

2. The following substantial questions of law arise for determination: a. Whether the Trial Court and the Appellate Court were correct in giving findings on the filing of the suit within limitation ? b. Whether the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court regarding the possession of Fate Mohammad are legal and correct? c. Whether the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court failed to properly appreciate the issue of succession to the property of Fate Mohammad?

(( 2 )) 973 CA NO. 12020 OF 2026

3. Admit.

4. Issue notice to the Respondents.

5. Call Record and Proceedings. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12020 OF 2026

1. This is an application seeking permission to withdraw Second Appeal No.638 of 2019 to the extent of land bearing Block No.268 admeasuring 6 Hectares 05 Ares and Block No.339 admeasuring 1 Hectare 38 Ares, situated at village Nandgaon, Taluka and District Latur.

2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.

3. Perused the application. Considering the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Accordingly. the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead