Bombay High Court
ABA/493/2026 of SANTOSH ALIAS NANA BASANTA BHANDARI Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 13 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 493 OF 2026 SANTOSH ALIAS NANA BASANTA BHANDARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Pruthviraj Somwanshi h/f Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for Applicant Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 493 OF 2026
SANTOSH ALIAS NANA BASANTA BHANDARI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Pruthviraj Somwanshi h/f Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for Applicant Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED
: 13th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate for the Applicant, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. The photo copy of written instructions is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purpose of identification.
2. In view of this, application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 915 ABA 493.2026.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48507