Bombay High Court
ABA/927/2026 of ASHOK PANDURANG PAIKRAO Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 13 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 927 OF 2026 ASHOK PANDURANG PAIKRAO VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for Applicant Ms. R. P. Gour, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 13th OCTOBER,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
916 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 927 OF 2026
ASHOK PANDURANG PAIKRAO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
...
Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for Applicant Ms. R. P. Gour, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED
: 13th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks lave to place on record copy of charge-sheet.
2. Leave granted.
3. The mother of the deceased is present before the Court.
4. After hearing the learned Advocates for both sides, when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief to the Applicant, learned Advocate for the Applicant sought permission to withdraw the Application.
5. In view of this, the Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 916 ABA 927.2026.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48506