Bombay High Court
SA/281/1989 of MANIK ANANTA SHIKKETOD (L.RS.) DHARMA and ANOTHER. Vs SUDAM KISHAN GAVANE . on 13 October 2026
281 OF 1989.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 SECOND APPEAL NO. 281 OF 1989 Manik Ananta Shikketod (l.rs.) Dharma And Another. VERSUS Sudam Kishan Gavane ... Ms. Choudhary S. S., Advocate for Appellant Nos.1(i) And 1(iii) Mr. B. R. Khekale, Advocate for
903 SA NO. 281 OF 1989.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 SECOND APPEAL NO. 281 OF 1989
Manik Ananta Shikketod (l.rs.) Dharma And Another.
VERSUS
Sudam Kishan Gavane
...
Ms. Choudhary S. S., Advocate for Appellant Nos.1(i) And 1(iii)
Mr. B. R. Khekale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 To 6
Mr. S. Y. Mahajan, Advocate for Respondent No.1
….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 13.10.2026
P.C. :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Appellant Nos. 1(i) and 1(iii) are present. Learned Advocate for Appellant Nos. 1(i) and 1(iii) submits that they are not willing to proceed further with the Appeal and wish to withdraw the same. Accordingly, on the basis of written instructions, she seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal.
2. Leave granted. The written instructions in Marathi are taken on record and marked as ‘X-1’ for identification. The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn insofar as Appellant Nos. 1(i) and 1(iii) are concerned. The Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution against the remaining Appellants. Pending Civil Applications, if any, are disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1