Bombay High Court
APPLN/4441/2025 of BHAIRAV ALIAS BAHIRU LAXMAN MORE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 13 October 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4767 OF 2025 JAYSHREE ALIAS BHIMABAI ANIL MORE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4441 OF 2025 BHAIRAV ALIAS BAHIRU LAXMAN MORE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4767 OF 2025
JAYSHREE ALIAS BHIMABAI ANIL MORE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4441 OF 2025
BHAIRAV ALIAS BAHIRU LAXMAN MORE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr.R.G.Narwade, Advocate for the Applicants in Cri.Appl.No.
4767/2025.
Mr.S.K.Shirse, APP for the Respondent/State.
Mr.S.E.Shekade, Advocate for Applicants in Cri.Appl.No.4441/2025 and Advocate for Respondent No.2 in Cri.Appl.No.4767/2025.
( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
DATE : 13th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In pursuance to the order dated 31.07.2026, the parties were directed to appear before the learned Registrar (Judicial) to execute their separate affidavit of compromise. Accordingly, the parties appeared on 10.08.2026 before the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and executed their separate affidavits. The learned Registrar (Judicial) also issued the report of compromise between the Applicants khs/Oct.2026/4767 2026:BHC-AUG:49188-DB
and Respondent No.2. The affidavit of Respondent No.2 discloses that he was the original informant in Crime No.577/2025 dated 07.07.2025 registered with Ahilyanagar Taluka Police Station for the offences punishable u/s 118(2), 115, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 189(2), 191(2), 190, 191(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. It further states that due to intervention of common relatives, the differences between them have been amicably settled and they do not want to continue with the criminal case and further Respondent No.2 also claims that he is not having any objection if the criminal proceedings are quashed.
3. In that view of the matter, Criminal Applications are allowed. FIR in both these criminal applications are quashed and set aside. The Applicants/Accused be set free, if not on bail and not required in any other crime.
4. These applications are disposed of, as such.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2026/4767