Bombay High Court
ABA/1543/2026 of SWATI GANESH SURYAWANSHI Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 13 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1543 OF 2026 Swati Ganesh Suryawanshi VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. K. N. Bhosale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J DATE :OCTOBER 13, 2026 P. C.
918-ABA-1543-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1543 OF 2026
Swati Ganesh Suryawanshi
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. K. N. Bhosale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE
:OCTOBER 13, 2026
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicant makes grievance that though offence against him provides for maximum sentence of 7 years, the investigating officer has not issued notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. According to him, on this count itself Application deserves to be allowed.
2. Learned APP, on telephonic instructions from the I.O., makes statement that the investigating officer would issue notice to the Applicant under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
3. In view of the said statement, nothing survives in the Application. Hence, Application stands disposed of. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani
2026:BHC-AUG:48584