Bombay High Court

CA/8511/2025 of OBAID M SHAIKH Vs THE CHAIRMAN MAULANA AZAD EDUCATON TRUST AND ANOTHER on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8511 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14142 OF 2024 Obaid M Shaikh VERSUS The Chairman, Maulana Azad Education Trust And Another …. Shri. A . N. Kakade, Advocate for the Applicant Adv. S. R. Nikam h/f. Adv.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8511 OF 2025

IN

WRIT PETITION NO. 14142 OF 2024

Obaid M Shaikh

VERSUS

The Chairman, Maulana Azad Education Trust And Another ….

Shri. A. N. Kakade, Advocate for the Applicant Adv. S. R. Nikam h/f. Adv. Yugant Ramchandra Marlapalle for the Respondents ….

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 14142 OF 2024

……

CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

Dated :

OCTOBER 13, 2026

PER COURT :-

IN CIVIL APPLICATION :

.

Pursuant to the order dated 15.04.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.14142 of 2024, the Respondent - Management has deposited an amount of Rs.3,16,823/- in this Court on 25.04.2025. By way of the present Civil Application, the Applicant - Employee is seeking withdrawal of the said amount.

2.

The Applicant - Employee states in the Application that, recently he met with an accident and sustained severe injuries. It is further stated that, he had to incur huge expenses towards his medical treatment. The medical papers are annexed from page nos.9 to 13 of

the Application. Findings of the Tribunal are in favour of the Applicant - Employee. Considering the grounds of objection raised by the Management in the Writ Petition, as also the fact that the Tribunal has allowed the Appeal filed by the Employee, and in order to balance the equities, I deem it appropriate to pass the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(i) The Application is allowed.

(ii) The Applicant–Employee is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the Respondent - Management in this Court, subject to filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

(iii) The Applicant – Employee shall undertake to redeposit the amount which is permitted to withdraw by this Court, if the Petition succeeds.

(iv) The Civil Application stands disposed of. IN WRIT PETITION :

(v) Place the Petition for further consideration on 29.10.2026. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) GGP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead