Bombay High Court
CP/219/2009 of TUKARAM KHANDU NAVLE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS on 12 October 2026
219-2009 IN W. P. 2059-2008.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 219 OF 2009 IN WP/2059/2008 TUKARAM KHANDU NAVLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ….. AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil ...... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
(1)
4- c.p. 219-2009 IN W. P. 2059-2008.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO. 219 OF 2009
IN WP/2059/2008
TUKARAM KHANDU NAVLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
…..
AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil
......
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026
ORDER (PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV J.):-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In the order under contempt, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to decide the application of the petitioner after hearing the concerned parties within a period of three months.
2. Thereafter, the Contempt Petition is dismissed against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as the petitioner has not taken any steps to serve respondent Nos.2 and 3. Thereafter the petition is not circulated since 03.02.2014. Therefore, it seems that, the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Contempt Petition.
3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/