Bombay High Court

WP/13725/2026 of MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SCHOOL THR ITS PRESIDENT ASHOK MUNDHE AND ANR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.13725 OF 2026 MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SCHOOL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT ASHOK MUNDHE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Swapnil Shyam Telang

1 49.WP.13725.26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.13725 OF 2026

MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SCHOOL THROUGH

ITS PRESIDENT ASHOK MUNDHE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH

ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Swapnil Shyam Telang AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Ms. Neha B. Kamble Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Avinash R. Borulkar

...

CORAM

: NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE

: 12.10.2026

PER COURT:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective sides.

2. This is the petition for direction to the respondents/authorities for reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioners/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

3. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Learned Advocate Mr. A.R. Borulkar waives service of notice for respondent No.1.

4. This petition is covered by the order dated 18/04/2026, passed 2026:BHC-AUG:48680-DB

2 49.WP.13725.26.odt by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court (Coram: Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.) in Writ Petition No.4127/2026 (Raghunandan Shaikshanik Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, Aurangabad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others).

5. Therefore, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposal independently on its own merits and take appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, the same shall be disbursed to the petitioners, within a period of four weeks thereafter. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead