Bombay High Court
BA/1377/2026 of ADITYA DNYANESHWAR ZALKE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1377 OF 2026 ADITYA DNYANESHWAR ZALKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S.D. Ghayal ...... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR,
-1-
43-BA-1377-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1377 OF 2026
ADITYA DNYANESHWAR ZALKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S.D. Ghayal
......
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 12th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate for the applicant fairly submits that, the application was filed prior to the filing of charge-sheet. He, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the present application with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court afresh along with the copy of charge-sheet.
2. Liberty as prayed is granted. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
3. In case the application is preferred, the learned Trial Court to decide the same on its own merits. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:48535