Bombay High Court
BA/1848/2026 of MANMATH RAOSAHEB MUSTAPURE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1848 OF 2026 MANMATH RAOSAHEB MUSTAPURE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Murlidhar S. Karad APP for Respondent - State : Mr. D. J. Patil ...... CORAM : HITEN S.
-1-
47-BA-1848-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1848 OF 2026
MANMATH RAOSAHEB MUSTAPURE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
......
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Murlidhar S. Karad APP for Respondent - State : Mr. D. J. Patil
......
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 12th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for applicant submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet has been filed, and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court.
2. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge-sheet.
3. In case the application is preferred alongwith the charge-sheet then the learned Trial Court shall decide the same in accordance with law.
4. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:48877