Bombay High Court
CA/13463/2010 of THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS Vs BHIMRAO CHUDAJI MISAL AND ORS on 12 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 245 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1661 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS BHIMRAO CHUDAJI MISAL AND ORS ... Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for appellants Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 9 ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13463 OF 2010 IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
245 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1661 OF 2015
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
VERSUS
BHIMRAO CHUDAJI MISAL AND ORS
...
Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for appellants
Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 9
...
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13463 OF 2010 IN FA/1661/2015
...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
. Heard learned AGP for the appellants.
By this appeal, the appellants assail the Judgment and Award dated 11.08.2008 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Beed in Land Acquisition Reference No.38 of 2007.
Learned AGP for the appellants submits that the compensation 2026:BHC-AUG:48724
245_FA_1661_2015 enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed.
The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd