Bombay High Court

WP/14027/2026 of KALAVATI VENKATRAO NEMANIWAR AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 WRIT PETITION NO.14027 OF 2026 Kalavati Venkatrao Nemaniwar And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. B.G. Londhe AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.K. Tambe Advocate for

wp 14207.2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

14 WRIT PETITION NO.14027 OF 2026

Kalavati Venkatrao Nemaniwar And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others

...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. B.G. Londhe AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.K. Tambe Advocate for Respondent no.4 : Mr. R.B. Bagul

...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

Dated

: October 12, 2026

...

PER COURT :-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioners challenges the notice dated 06.10.2026 issued by respondent no.4 directing petitioners to remove the encroachment which is coming within ROW. The petitioners contend that they have valid construction permission issued to them on 25.3.2025.

2. Upon hearing learned advocate for petitioners, learned advocate for Respondents, learned AGP for State and on recording undertaking of the petitioners that if their construction comes within ROW, they themselves will remove it.

3. Learned advocate appearing for respondent no.4, on instructions from Mr.Shripad Sharadrao Deshpande, (Sub 2026:BHC-AUG:48483

wp 14207.2026.odt Divisional Officer, National High way, Sub-Division, Bhokar), who is present in the Court, submit that, notice was issued to the petitioners to remain present alongwith necessary documents, and after measurement is carried out, after hearing the petitioners, if some part of the petitioner’s property comes within ROW, then, that much portion will be removed.

4. We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of the writ petition. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) ... aaa/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead