Bombay High Court
CP/307/2005 of SATISH DATTU KATLE Vs RAJPAL V PATIL and ANR on 12 October 2026
307-2005.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 307 OF 2005 IN WP/5747/2004 SATISH DATTU KATLE ….Petitioner VERSUS RAJPAL V PATIL AND ANOTHER …..Respondents ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R R Suryawanshi AGP for
(1)
2- c. p. 307-2005.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO. 307 OF 2005
IN WP/5747/2004
SATISH DATTU KATLE
….Petitioner
VERSUS
RAJPAL V PATIL AND ANOTHER
…..Respondents
…..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R R Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde
.......
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026
ORDER (PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.):-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Contempt Petition is filed for compliance of ad-interim order passed in the Writ Petition. But subsequently the Writ Petition itself is disposed of on 20.06.2017.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition and the same is disposed of with liberty that if at all the directions in the Writ Petition are not complied with, the petitioner can seek appropriate remedy as available in law. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/