Bombay High Court
FA/2849/2013 of THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR Vs SUBHASH YESHWANTRAO GAIKWAD (DIED) LRS LAXMIBAI GAIKWAD AND ANR on 12 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 236 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2849 OF 2013 THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR VERSUS SUBHASH YESHWANTRAO GAIKWAD (DIED) LRS LAXMIBAI GAIKWAD AND ANR ... Mr. S.N. Morampalle, AGP for appellants ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2026 ORDER :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
236 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2849 OF 2013
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
VERSUS
SUBHASH YESHWANTRAO GAIKWAD (DIED) LRS LAXMIBAI GAIKWAD
AND ANR
...
Mr. S.N. Morampalle, AGP for appellants
...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
. Heard learned AGP for the appellants.
By this appeal, the appellants assail the Judgment and Award dated 13.04.2007 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Nilanga in Land Acquisition Reference No.539 of 1998.
Learned AGP for the appellants submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 2026:BHC-AUG:48726
236_FA_2849_2013
In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed.
The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd