Bombay High Court
FA/142/2017 of THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs NANA KISAN VADAVKAR AND ANR on 12 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 219 FIRST APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS NANA KISAN VADAVKAR AND ANR ... Mr. S.N. Morampalle, AGP for appellant Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 12th
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
219 FIRST APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2017
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
VERSUS
NANA KISAN VADAVKAR AND ANR
...
Mr. S.N. Morampalle, AGP for appellant
Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2
...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
. Heard learned AGP for the appellant.
By this appeal, the appellant assail the Judgment and Award dated 30.01.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Shrigonda in Land Acquisition Reference No.393 of 2003.
Learned AGP for the appellant submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 2026:BHC-AUG:48727
219_FA_142_2017
In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed.
The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd