Bombay High Court
WP/503/2021 of INDUBAI W/O. TABAR CHAVAN Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 12 October 2026
W. P. 1720-2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1720 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2021 INDUBAI W/O. TABAR CHAVAN ….Petitioner VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS …..Respondent ….. APP for
(1)
14- Cri. W. P. 1720-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1720 OF 2022
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2021
INDUBAI W/O. TABAR CHAVAN
….Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…..Respondent
…..
APP for Respondent/State: Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar
....
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : OCTOBER 12, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
1. The learned A.G.P. submits that in both these petitions there is no instructions to her as the matter is too old, even otherwise also the petitioner in both these petitions is not diligent to pursue the matter. Even the notices are not issued in these matters. The petitioner after filing these petitions never care to prosecute the matter or to circulate the matter. As such both these petitions stand dismissed for non prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/