Bombay High Court
FA/2305/2014 of THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THR COLLECTOR LATUR Vs VIHWANATH MANSING CHAVAN on 12 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 202 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2305 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THR COLLECTOR LATUR VERSUS VIHWANATH MANSING CHAVAN ... Mr. A.M. Phule, AGP for appellant Ms. Bhagyashree S. Kamble, Advocate h/f Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
202 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2305 OF 2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THR COLLECTOR LATUR
VERSUS
VIHWANATH MANSING CHAVAN
...
Mr. A.M. Phule, AGP for appellant
Ms. Bhagyashree S. Kamble, Advocate h/f Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for respondent No.1
Mr. P.R. Tandale, Advocate for respondent No.2
...
AND
203 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2306 OF 2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE COLLECTOR LATUR
VERSUS
KISAN ATMARAM MALUSARE AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for appellant
Ms. Bhagyashree S. Kamble, Advocate h/f Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for respondent No.1
Mr. P.R. Tandale, Advocate for respondent No.2
...
AND
204 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2307 OF 2014
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE COLLECTOR LATUR
VERSUS
SHIVAJI MANSING CHAVAN AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. A.D. Wange, AGP for appellant
Ms. Bhagyashree S. Kamble, Advocate h/f Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for respondent No.1
Mr. P.R. Tandale, Advocate for respondent No.2
...
2026:BHC-AUG:48717
202_FA_2305_2014+2
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
. Heard learned AGP for the appellant in all three matters.
By these appeals, the appellants assail the Judgment and Award dated 11.03.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Udgir in Land Acquisition Reference Nos.1277 of 2010, 1278 of 2010 and 1279 of 2010.
Learned AGP for the appellant as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only up to four times.
202_FA_2305_2014+2
Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeals are dismissed.
The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
In view of dismissal of the appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) agd