Bombay High Court
CP/95/2014 of SUYOG BAHUUDESHIYA SHAIKSHANIK SAMAJIK, SEVABHAVI SANSTHA, GONDUR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2014 IN WP/9239/2010 Shri Padmavati Shikshan Sanstha Versus The State Of Maharashtra And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Rudrawar S. G. for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
902, 905 & 906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2014 IN WP/9239/2010 Shri Padmavati Shikshan Sanstha Versus The State Of Maharashtra And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Rudrawar S. G. for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2014 IN WP/2034/2013 Suyog Bahuudeshiya Shaikshanik, Samajik, Sevabhavi Sanstha Through its Secretary Versus The State Of Maharashtra And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Rudrawar S. G. for the Petitioner • Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 101 OF 2014 IN WP/5013/2010 Sow. Gunabai Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through its Secretary Versus The State Of Maharashtra And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Rudrawar S. G. for the Petitioner • Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026 Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:48785
902, 905 & 906 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the subject matter of the contempt petitions has become infructuous.
As such, nothing survives in the contempt petitions and the same are disposed of as infructuous. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 2 of 2