Bombay High Court
BA/1585/2026 of VINOD VILAS MINDLEKAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2026 VINOD VILAS MINDLEKAR AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. A.K. Bhosle APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.K Naik … CORAM : HITEN S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 NOB-7.BA-1585-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2026 VINOD VILAS MINDLEKAR AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. A.K. Bhosle APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.K Naik …
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 09.10.2026 PER COURT : . Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for applicants submits that, during pendency of present application, charge-sheet has been filed, and therefore he has instructions to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court.
3. Permission to withdraw is granted with liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Trial Court along with copy of charge- sheet.
4. In case the application is preferred alongwith the charge-sheet then the learned Trial Court shall decide the same in accordance with law.
5. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) V.S.Joshi 2026:BHC-AUG:48587