Bombay High Court
CP/684/2026 of Mayur Pramod Thakur Vs the state of Maharashtra through secretary tribal development department mantralya on 9 October 2026
NO. 684 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 CONT. PETITION NO. 684 OF 2026 IN WP/6162/2026 Mayur Pramod Thakur And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Mr. Wagh Mukulanand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 CONT. PETITION NO. 684 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 CONT. PETITION NO. 684 OF 2026 IN WP/6162/2026 Mayur Pramod Thakur And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Mr. Wagh Mukulanand Ravikant, Advocate for the Petitioner • Ms. M. N. Ghanekar,AGP for Respondent/s - State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026 PER COURT :
Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the tribe claims of the petitioners would be decided within two weeks.
We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of this contempt petition.
We make it clear that if the claims are not decided within the aforesaid stipulated period, then it will be treated as an aggravated form of contempt on the part of the respondent-Scrutiny Committee. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48901-DB