Bombay High Court
APPLN/4131/2026 of PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS Vs KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI) on 9 October 2026
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4131 OF 2026 IN/WITH REVNST/11227/2026 PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS VERSUS KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI) WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2026 KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI) VERSUS PRIYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4131 OF 2026
IN/WITH
REVNST/11227/2026
PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS
VERSUS
KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI)
WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2026
KULDIP WALMIK KORE (KOLI)
VERSUS
PRIYA KULDIP KORE (KOLI) AND OTHERS
…..
Mr Adnan Shaikh, Advocate h/f Mr F. K. Patel, Advocate for Applicants in Cr.Revn Appln(st.)No.11227/2026 and for respondents in Cr.Rev Appln No.335/2026
Mr A. S. Mirajgaonkar, Advocate h/f Mr A. S. Radikar, Advocate for respondent in Cr.Revn Appln(st.)No.11227/2026 and for Applicant in Cr.Revn Appln No.335/2026
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 09th OCTOBER, 2026
P. C. :
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4131 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 478 days caused in preferring criminal revision application by the applicant/wife and others, who are challenging the judgment and order dated 17/03/2025, passed by the learned Family Court, Latur in Petition E-30/2022 for enhancement of maintenance.
2. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.
3. Mr Shaikh, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr Patel for applicants states that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate and is due to bona fide and unavoidable reasons. He, therefore, prays for allowing the present application by condoning the delay.
4. Per contra, Mr Mirajgaonkar, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr Radikar for respondent/husband strongly opposes the present criminal application and prays for dismissal of the same.
5. Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, this Court is of the opinion that the delay for preferring the criminal revision application has been properly explained and the application deserves to be allowed.
6. In that view of the matter, this criminal application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Criminal Application is disposed of.
7. Criminal Revision Application (st.) No.11227/2026 be registered. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 11227 OF 2026
8. Heard learned Advocate for the applicants.
9. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 23/10/2026.
10. Mr Radikar, learned Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk