Bombay High Court
WP/7058/2014 of PRAKASH ANKUSH GHODKE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7058 OF 2014 Prakash Ankush Ghodke VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … • Mr. V. P. Savant, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent - State … CORAM :
903-WP-7058-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7058 OF 2014
Prakash Ankush Ghodke
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
•
Mr. V. P. Savant, Advocate for the Petitioner •
Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent - State …
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE
: 09th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned AGP for the Respondent–State for some time.
2. The Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a declaration that the action of the Respondents in declaring him ineligible for the post of Junior Body Fitter is illegal. The Petitioner further seeks a declaration that he is eligible for the said post and a direction to the Respondents to consider his claim for appointment to the said post by following due process of law.
3. During the course of arguments, it was brought to our notice that the issue involved in the present Petition has already been decided by this Court in Sandipan Pandharinath Pawar Vs. The Maharashtra State Transport Corporation (M.S.R.T.C.), Mumbai and Others, Writ Petition No. 7148 of 2014. This Court, by an order dated 24.02.2015, dismissed the said Petition. Jhs/
2026:BHC-AUG:48553-DB
903-WP-7058-2014
4. Considering that the issue involved in the present Petition has already been decided by this Court, we find that the present Petition deserves to be dismissed.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Jhs/