Bombay High Court
CP/187/2013 of SARASWATI GANPATRAO MORE Vs DR. PURUSHOTTAM BHAPKAR AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN WP/3030/2012 Saraswati D/o. Ganpatrao More Versus Dr. Purushottam Bhapkar And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Akram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2013 IN WP/3030/2012 Saraswati D/o. Ganpatrao More Versus Dr. Purushottam Bhapkar And 2 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Akram Inamdar h/f. Adv. Kazi S. S. for the Petitioner • Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
Learned advocate Mr. Inamdar holding for Mr. Kazi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the order under contempt is an interim order passed in the writ petition. Subsequently, the writ petition itself was disposed of on 26.04.2016.
In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48765