Bombay High Court
APEAL/644/2026 of SATISH ALIS ATISH SANDIP GAIKAWAD Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 9 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 493 OF 2026 PRAKASH BABURAO DHOTRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 644 OF 2026 SATISH ALIS ATISH SANDIP GAIKWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. R. N. Jadhav, Advocate for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 493 OF 2026
PRAKASH BABURAO DHOTRE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
AND
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 644 OF 2026
SATISH ALIS ATISH SANDIP GAIKWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. R. N. Jadhav, Advocate for Appellant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for the Respondent/State Mr. N. N. Bhagwat, Advocate for Respondent No.3 (appointed)
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED
: 15th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes orders dated 09.10.2026.
2. Learned Advocate for Respondent No. 3 submits that, in the said orders, his name has been wrongly typed as “Bhagat” and “Bhawat” instead of “Bhagwat”. He, therefore, seeks correction in the said orders.
3. In view of the above, the necessary correction be carried out and the corrected orders be uploaded accordingly. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp criapeal493.26.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:47863 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //