Bombay High Court
CA/7779/2025 of DATTATRAY SHANKAR PATIL Vs Chandrakant Hari Badhe on 9 October 2026
ca 7779.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7779 OF 2025 IN SAST/14278/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6317 OF 2025 IN CA/169/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2025 IN SAST/14278/2024 DATTATRAY SHANKAR PATIL VERSUS CHANDRAKANT HARI BADHE
901 ca 7779.25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7779 OF 2025 IN SAST/14278/2024
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6317 OF 2025 IN CA/169/2025
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 169 OF 2025 IN SAST/14278/2024
DATTATRAY SHANKAR PATIL
VERSUS
CHANDRAKANT HARI BADHE
…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shakil Shaikh h/f. P. P. Dama
…..
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE :
09.10.2026
P.C.:-
Civil Application No.7779 of 2025:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Court directed the applicant to file an application with detailed information for condonation of delay. Consequently, Civil Application No. 168/2025 was filed and subsequently allowed by this Court by an order dated 23.09.2026.
2. The learned advocate for the applicant submits that, while the Court was allowing that application, he mistakenly failed to point out that Civil Application No. 7779/2025 should also be disposed of. Considering the fact that the delay has been condoned by this Court, Civil Application No. 7779/2025 is hereby disposed of. 2026:BHC-AUG:48165
901 ca 7779.25 Civil Application No.6317 of 2025:
3. By this application the following relief is sought: “B) By allowing this Civil Application, there is no any requirement to issue notice to the un-served respondents as they are formal party and contesting party i.e. respondent No.2 already appeared in the matter.”
4. As the respondent no.2 has already appeared. Application is allowed. Appeal:
5. It is submitted that second appeal (stamp) no.11336/2016 is connected with this matter. It be tagged with this appeal. Stand over to 14.10.2026 at 02.30 p.m. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir