Bombay High Court
ABA/1623/2026 of AMBADAS ASARAM MHASKE AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 9 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1623 OF 2026 AMBADAS ASARAM MHASKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Vijay B. Jagtap, Advocate for Applicants Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1623 OF 2026
AMBADAS ASARAM MHASKE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Vijay B. Jagtap, Advocate for Applicants Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED
: 9th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This application was heard on the last date of hearing, when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief to the Applicants. Learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants, therefore, sought time to obtain instructions as to whether the application was to be withdrawn.
2. Today, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
3. In view of the above, application stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 901 ABA 1623.2026.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:47848