Bombay High Court
APPLN/4212/2023 of BASAVRAJ VISHWANATHAPPA CHIVDE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 9 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 968 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4212 OF 2023 Basavraj Vishwanathappa Chivde And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. R. P. Cheble h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. A . R. Kale, APP for Respondent No. 1 Mr. R.
968-CA-4212-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
968 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4212 OF 2023
Basavraj Vishwanathappa Chivde And Others
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. R. P. Cheble h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for Respondent No. 1
Mr. R. B. Narwade Patil, for Respondent No. 2
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE
:OCTOBER 09, 2026
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsels for both sides, on instruction, make statement that the parties have settled the dispute and terms of compromise are already placed on record.
2. Learned APP opposed application.
3. The record also indicates that learned Registrar (Judicial) has verified the terms of compromise so also compromise arrived at between the parties on their free will. Learned Counsel for Informant on the basis of compromise records no objection for allowing application.
4. Considering the facts that this is a matrimonial dispute and parties have settled the same, application deserves to be allowed.
5. In view of above, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘B-1’, ‘B-2’ and ‘B-3’. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani
2026:BHC-AUG:48236-DB