Bombay High Court
BA/1501/2026 of DATTATRAYA MARUTI KSHIRSAGAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1501 OF 2026 DATTATRAYA MARUTI KSHIRSAGAR VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. S.S. Jadhav APP for Respondent/State : Ms.Ashlesha S. Deshmukh … CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 NOB-3.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1501 OF 2026 DATTATRAYA MARUTI KSHIRSAGAR VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. S.S. Jadhav APP for Respondent/State : Ms.Ashlesha S. Deshmukh …
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 09.10.2026 PER COURT : . Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the application for the reason that pending the application, the charge-sheet has been filed. Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application alongwith charge-sheet before the learned trial Court.
4. If any such application is preferred, then the same may be decided on its own merits.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) V.S.Joshi 2026:BHC-AUG:48858