Bombay High Court
WP/6975/2015 of VINAY SHANTILAL MUTHA Vs PREMCHAND BADRILAL MUTHA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6975 OF 2015 VINAY SHANTILAL MUTHA VERSUS PREMCHAND BADRILAL MUTHA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Abhijit Choudhari h/f. Mr. Vijay V. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.15 : Ms. Aarti T. Gadge
1
50-WP-6975-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6975 OF 2015
VINAY SHANTILAL MUTHA
VERSUS
PREMCHAND BADRILAL MUTHA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Abhijit Choudhari h/f.
Mr. Vijay V. Deshmukh
Advocate for Respondent No.15 : Ms. Aarti T. Gadge h/f.
Mr. Dhananjay M. Shinde
...
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4909 OF 2017 IN WP/6975/2015
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE
: 08-10-2026
PER COURT:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in view of the subsequent developments, this writ petition is rendered infructuous and nothing survives in the petition for consideration. As such, the writ petition is disposed of.
2. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court, if the occasion arise.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE rrd 2026:BHC-AUG:47573