Bombay High Court

FA/1704/2014 of THE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Vs NARAYAN GYANOBA PATIL AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 290 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1704 OF 2014 THE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS NARAYAN GYANOBA PATIL AND OTHERS ... AGP for appellants/State : Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondent/State : Mr. A.B. Kale ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S.

FA 1704/14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

290 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1704 OF 2014

THE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

NARAYAN GYANOBA PATIL AND OTHERS

...

AGP for appellants/State : Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondent/State : Mr. A.B. Kale

...

CORAM

: SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.

Dated

: October 08, 2026

PER COURT :-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1987, heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for respective parties.

2. By this appeal, the State assails the judgment and award dated 13.12.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, in LAR No. 735/2005.

3. The land of the claimants situated at village Naichakur was acquired for the project of Rehabilitation of village Naichakur. Notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act came to be published on 9.3.1987. Possession of the acquired land was taken on 5.11.1993. On 23.1.1989 Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) has declared the award and has granted compensation of Rs.21,000/- per H. for group I lands, Rs.22,000/- per H. for group III land. After accepting the amount under protest, the claimants sought reference under section 18 of the Act.

4. Before the reference court, the claimants relied upon the sale deed, Exh. 15, of the year 1997 by which land from village Narangwadi was sold for Rs.19,151/-. The claimants also relied upon the sale deed, Exh. 16, of 2026:BHC-AUG:48268

FA 1704/14

the year 1989 by which land from village Killari was sold for Rs.20,000/- and the sale deed, Exh.17 by which the land from village Mangrul was sold for Rs.15,000/-. The learned reference court, relying upon the sale deeds, Exh. 15 and 16 and order passed in LAR No. 58/2005, which was in respect of the lands acquired from the same village for the same project, has granted compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per R. to the claimants. It is not brought to the notice of this court that the order passed in LAR No. 58/2005 was assailed by the State or the same was modified or set aside by this Court. As relying upon the order passed in LAR No. 58/2005 the learned reference court has granted compensation, which arise from the same village for the same project, this Court is of the view that the reference court has rightly determined the compensation for acquired lands. Therefore, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is devoid of merits. Hence, the same is dismissed. Pending civil application, if any, also stands disposed of.

( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead