Bombay High Court

FA/2730/2023 of EX. ENGINEER, IRRI. PRO. STRE. OMERGA AND ORS Vs LESHABAI MANIKRAO JAGTAP on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.2730 OF 2023 Executive Engineeer, Irrigation Project Strengthening (Majbutikaram) Division, Omerga, Now merged in Osmanabad Medium Project Division, Osmanabad and others ..Appellants Vs. Smt. Leshabai w/o. Manikrao Jagtap,

2-fa2730.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

FIRST APPEAL NO.2730 OF 2023

Executive Engineeer, Irrigation Project

Strengthening (Majbutikaram) Division,

Omerga, Now merged in Osmanabad

Medium Project Division,

Osmanabad and others

..Appellants

Vs.

Smt. Leshabai w/o. Manikrao Jagtap,

Age:Major, Occ. Agriculturist,

r/o. Arali (Bk), Tq. Tuljapur,

Dist. Osmanabad

..Respondent

----

Mrs.S.D.Shelke, Advocate for appellants

Mr.A.T.Jagtap, Advocate for respondent

----

CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER :-

Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and award passed by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Osmanabad in Land Acquisition Reference No.169 of 2004 the acquiring body is in First Appeal before this court.

2. The appellant has challenged enhancement granted by the Reference Court in the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer against the compulsory acquisition. 2026:BHC-AUG:48238

2-fa2730.2023

3. Learned advocates for both sides cite an order dated 16.07.2026 passed by this Court in First Appeal No.1200 of

(the

Executive

Engineer,

Irrigation

Project Strenghtening (Majbutikaran) Division, Omerga and others Vs. Bhima Krishna Gidde) with connected matters. They submit that the cited matters arose out of the same land acquisition proceedings and are absolutely identical to the present matter. It is submitted that after considering all the contentions raised by the acquiring body in those appeals, the said appeals are dismissed by this Court. Learned advocate for the appellant fairly submits that the grounds of objections in the said appeals as also in the present appeal are same and absolutely identical.

4. I have gone through the order in the cited matter. There is no reason for me to disagree with the view taken by this Court in the cited cases. Hence, I pass following order:- A) The First Appeal stands dismissed. B) Record and Proceedings be sent back to the Reference Court.

2-fa2730.2023 C) The amount deposited by the acquiring body, if any, is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent – claimant. Security, if any, already offered by the claimant stands discharged. D) The Court appreciates the assistance rendered by Mrs. Shelke, learned advocate for the appellant – acquiring body. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ………..

KBP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead