Bombay High Court
BA/1783/2026 of SUJIT SANJAY KOLGE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 961 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1783 OF 2026 SUJIT SANJAY KOLGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A . Jahagirdar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.K. Naik … CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 961.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 961 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1783 OF 2026 SUJIT SANJAY KOLGE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.K. Naik …
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 08.10.2026 PER COURT : . Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, during the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet came to be filed by the Investigating Officer. He submits that, he has instruction to withdraw the application and to approach the learned trial Court.
2. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to file fresh application alongwith the charge-sheet.
3. In case the application is preferred, the trial Court to decide the same on its own merits.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:47834