Bombay High Court
BA/1912/2026 of PRAKASH RAMRAO CHAVAN Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1912 OF 2026 PRAKASH RAMRAO CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Suraj R. Bagal h/f. Mr. Gadegaonkar Bharat N. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha … CORAM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 965.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1912 OF 2026 PRAKASH RAMRAO CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Suraj R. Bagal h/f. Mr. Gadegaonkar Bharat N. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha …
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 08.10.2026 PER COURT : . Upon showing disinclination to allow the application, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application after the filing of charge-sheet before the trial Court. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed for is granted.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:47833