Bombay High Court
BA/1930/2026 of SHRIPATI UTTAMRAO GHULE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 969 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1930 OF 2026 SHRIPATI UTTAMRAO GHULE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Pathan Sartaj Khan H. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha … CORAM : HITEN S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 969.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 969 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1930 OF 2026 SHRIPATI UTTAMRAO GHULE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Pathan Sartaj Khan H. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha …
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 08.10.2026 PER COURT : . Learned APP submits that the investigation is complete and charge-sheet is likely to be filed within two (02) days.
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawl of the application with liberty to approach the trial Court after filing of the charge-sheet.
3. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In case, a fresh application is filed alongwith the charge-sheet, the learned trial Court to decide the same on its own merits.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:47832