Bombay High Court
ABA/1445/2026 of PRASHANT RAMDAS BINORKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1445 OF 2026 Prashant Ramdas Binorkar ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. V. A . Bagdiya, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for the
aba1445.26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1445 OF 2026
Prashant Ramdas Binorkar
….Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
…..Respondent
Mr. V. A. Bagdiya, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for the State.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026.
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the second bail application. This application is moved for the reason that the co-accused are granted pre-arrest bail by this Court by order dated 29.07.2026 passed in Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 832/2026, 993/2026 and 1123/2026.
2. Learned Counsel for Applicant submits that since the co- accused, who have similar role in the crime, are granted pre-arrest bail, this becomes change in circumstance to entertain the present Application.
3. Learned APP opposed the said contention by pointing out order dated 10.02.2026 indicating that after hearing both sides and after aba1445.26.odt recorded disinclination on merit to grant any relief, said application came to be withdrawn.
4. Needless to say that in case there is change in the circumstance, it is open for the parties to prefer subsequent bail application. However, such change must be in the context of the Applicant himself. Insofar as granting bail to co-accused is concerned, it has no relevant with the grant/rejection of bail of the present Applicant. If it is admitted fact that bail application of the Applicant was rejected on merit, it is not open for this Court to review the said order. Hence, application stands dismissed. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
dyb