Bombay High Court
CA/11660/2026 of AFROZ S/O. AYUB KHAN. Vs TANZEELANAZ W/O. AFROZ KHAN. on 8 October 2026
. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11660 OF 2026 IN FCAST/14030/2026 AFROZ S/O. AYUB KHAN. VERSUS TANZEELANAZ W/O. AFROZ KHAN. ... Mr. Shaikh Moinuddin Nasiruddin, Advocate for Applicant …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
940 ca 11660-26 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11660 OF 2026
IN FCAST/14030/2026
AFROZ S/O. AYUB KHAN.
VERSUS
TANZEELANAZ W/O. AFROZ KHAN.
...
Mr. Shaikh Moinuddin Nasiruddin, Advocate for Applicant ….
CORAM
:
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date
:
08/10/2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The applicant-husband seeks restoration of his First Appeal by setting aside the order dated 14/07/2026, whereby the application for restoration came to be rejected on account of non-removal of the office objections within three weeks.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’, subject to removal of the office objections within a period of three weeks. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47555-DB