Bombay High Court
WP/1663/2022 of CHETAN KUMAR LAKHWANI Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
1663-22 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1663 OF 2022 CHETAN KUMAR LAKHWANI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sartaj H. Pathan h/f Mr. Bhide Vinod Y., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for
923 cri. wp 1663-22 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
923 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1663 OF 2022
CHETAN KUMAR LAKHWANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Sartaj H. Pathan h/f Mr. Bhide Vinod Y., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent-State Mr. Borulkar Avinash R., Advocate for Respondent No.6
Mr. Savale Amit S., Advocate for Respondent No. 4
….
CORAM
:
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date
:
08/10/2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel, holding for Mr. Bhide, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to agitate the petitioner’s grievance before the concerned Court.
2. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47592-DB