Bombay High Court
CP/188/2014 of VIJAYSINGH RAMSINGH PATIL AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
cp 187-14 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONT. PETITION NO. 187 OF 2014 IN WP/3927/2013 SANJAY BHIMRAO NIMBALKAR VERSUS NARAYAN DRUPATRAO GADHEKAR AND OTHERS ... Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
906 & 907 cp 187-14 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONT. PETITION NO. 187 OF 2014 IN WP/3927/2013 SANJAY BHIMRAO NIMBALKAR VERSUS NARAYAN DRUPATRAO GADHEKAR AND OTHERS ... Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State …. AND 907 CONT. PETITION NO. 188 OF 2014 IN WP/8378/2013 VIJAYSINGH RAMSINGH PATIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Patil Vinod Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State ….
CORAM
: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT : Learned counsel holding for Mr. Patil, on instructions, submits that the orders passed in the contempt proceedings have been duly complied with in both these petitions. In view of the same, both these petitions stand disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47637-DB