Bombay High Court
CP/149/2019 of LAXMAN MAROTI TURUKMANE Vs VASANTRAO DATTATRAYA DESHMUKH AND OTHER on 8 October 2026
. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONT. PETITION NO. 149 OF 2019 IN LPA/58/2010 LAXMAN MAROTI TURUKMANE VERSUS VASANTRAO DATTATRAYA DESHMUKH AND OTHER ... Mr. D. A . Karnik h/f Mr. Dhage Vivek J., Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
908 cp 149-19 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONT. PETITION NO. 149 OF 2019 IN LPA/58/2010 LAXMAN MAROTI TURUKMANE VERSUS VASANTRAO DATTATRAYA DESHMUKH AND OTHER ... Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f Mr. Dhage Vivek J., Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Shinde Dhananjay M., Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 ….
CORAM
: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT : Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has placed on record a copy of the order dated 21/11/2013 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, mentioning that the order under contempt has been set aside. The said order is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present petition. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47615-DB