Bombay High Court

WP/13499/2026 of INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13499 OF 2026 INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shivashish V. Bhopi AGP for Respondents: Mr. N.D.

1 37.WP.13499.26.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 13499 OF 2026

INDIA SHELTER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH

THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shivashish V. Bhopi AGP for Respondents: Mr. N.D. Batule

...

CORAM

: NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE

: 08.10.2026

PER COURT:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned AGP for State.

2. Petitioner is a Housing Finance Company, seeking repossession of the secured assets in view of the order dated 30/03/2026 passed by learned District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which the borrowers namely Archana Fargade and Mr. Manohar Fargade have illegally trespassed. Hence, the direction is sought to the respondents authorities to take the physical possession of the property as mentioned in order and to handover the 2026:BHC-AUG:48243-DB

2 37.WP.13499.26.odt same to the petitioner.

3. In view of the decision rendered by this Court at Principal Seat in Writ Petition No.6805/2023 [Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others] on 30/06/2023, the petition will have to be allowed. Respondent No.3 Tahsildar, Ahmednagar is directed to take possession of the secured assets within a period of eight weeks from today and hand over the same to the petitioner. Petitioner is willing to pay the necessary charges for police protection. The in-charge of the concerned police station to ensure that adequate police protection is provided to take back the possession of the secured assets and to hand it over to the petitioner.

4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

5. List the matter on 03/12/2026, for compliance. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead