Bombay High Court

WP/6067/2023 of POPAT GANGARAM NARAD Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6067 OF 2023 POPAT GANGARAM NARAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar AGP for Respondents: Ms. Neha B. Kamble ... CORAM : NITIN B.

1 WP.6067.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 6067 OF 2023

POPAT GANGARAM NARAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

…

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar AGP for Respondents: Ms. Neha B. Kamble

...

CORAM

: NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND

ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE

: 08.10.2026

PER COURT:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Vijay S. Shedage (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra ; 2026 DGLS (Bom.) 2043.

2. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘D’, and ‘E’, which read as follows: “B) By issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to hold and declare that, the petitioner is governed under the Old Pension Scheme i.e. Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and Provident Fund which are General applicable to the Assistant Teachers, who are appointed prior to 01/11/2005. C) By issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order 2026:BHC-AUG:48524-DB

2 WP.6067.23.odt or directions in the like nature this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to release the pensionary benefits as admissible under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules,1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984. D) By issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 school forthwith submits the pension papers of the petitioner before the respondent No.3 and 4 for granting old pension scheme. E) By issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in the like nature this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to refund the deducted amount of the petitioner with interest by applying the DCPS or NPS by the respondents, within a period of four weeks.” (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead