Bombay High Court
CA/14902/2019 of MAHESHWARI PULSES THR ITS PROPRIETOR, LATUR Vs MEHEBOOB FARIDSAB PATHAN AND ORS on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14902 OF 2019 IN FAST/36611/2019 Maheshwari Pulses Thr Its Proprietor, Latur VERSUS Meheboob Faridsab Pathan And Ors ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Godbharle Vinod D. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1
1
904-ca-14902-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14902 OF 2019
IN FAST/36611/2019
Maheshwari Pulses Thr Its Proprietor, Latur
VERSUS
Meheboob Faridsab Pathan And Ors
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Godbharle Vinod D.
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. G.R. Syed
...
CORAM :
ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATED :
OCTOBER 07, 2026
P.C.:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. There is delay of 143 days in filing the first appeal. The delay is explained by stating that there was communication gap between learned advocate representing the appellant and appellant, as a consequence of which, the appellant was not aware about passing of judgment by learned Commissioner of Compensation. It is stated that it is only upon receiving notice in the execution that the appellant got knowledge about impugned judgment and award passed by learned Commissioner of Compensation.
2. In view of the above, statements in the application which are made on affirmation although the application is strongly opposed, the same is allowed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to be paid to the respondent/employee. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Mujaheed// 2026:BHC-AUG:47040