Bombay High Court
CP/251/2019 of BHAUSAHEB SAKHARAM NAVTHAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.251 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.539 OF 2017 BHAUSAHEB SAKHARAM NAVTHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... AGP for respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
251.19CP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.251 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.539 OF 2017 BHAUSAHEB SAKHARAM NAVTHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... AGP for respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 07.10.2026 P.C. :
None for the petitioner. However, the learned AGP by pointing out affidavit-in-reply submits that the order under contempt is already complied with by granting pensionary benefits to the petitioner and also regular pension.
In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:47742-DB