Bombay High Court
BA/671/2026 of SUNIL DAYANAND ALIAS JAYKAR MANDALE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 671 OF 2026 Sunil Dayanand @ Jaykar Mandale ..APPLICANT VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT .... Mr. V.K. Kotecha, A.P.P. for respondent - State .... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT
950-BA-671-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 671 OF 2026
Sunil Dayanand @ Jaykar Mandale
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra
..RESPONDENT
....
Mr. V.K. Kotecha, A.P.P. for respondent - State
....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned A.P.P. submits that during the pendency of present bail application, the main matter itself has been decided and the applicant has been convicted. He placed on record the photo-copy of case status, which indicates that the case has been disposed of and the applicant has been convicted.
2. Same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification purpose. In the light of above, present bail application becomes infructuous. Hence, same is dismissed. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) SSD 1 / 1 2026:BHC-AUG:47731