Bombay High Court
BA/1895/2026 of GANPAT PRABHAKAR KIRTANE AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1895 OF 2026 1. Ganpat Prabhakar Kirtane 2. Karan Baliram Alane ..APPLICANTS VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT .... Ms. R.C. Waghmare, Advocate for applicants Mr. S.D. Ghayal, A.P.P. for respondent - State ....
902-BA-1895-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1895 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ganpat Prabhakar Kirtane
2. Karan Baliram Alane ..APPLICANTS VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT .... Ms. R.C. Waghmare, Advocate for applicants Mr. S.D. Ghayal, A.P.P. for respondent - State .... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :
1. After showing disinclination, learned counsel for the applicants seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file fresh application before the learned Trial Court after filing of the charge-sheet.
2. Leave is granted. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed is granted. In case fresh application is filed by the applicants after filing of the charge-sheet, same be decided by the learned Trial Court on it’s own merits. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) SSD 1 / 1 2026:BHC-AUG:47730